|
Genetics of Drosophila melanogaster |
![]() |
|
|
|
Introduction:
Gregor Mendel revolutionized the study of genetics.
By studying genetic inheritance in pea plants, Gregor Mendel established two
basic laws of that serve as the cornerstones of modern genetics: Mendel’s
Law of Segregation and Law of Independent Assortment. Mendel’s Law of
Segregation says that each trait has two alleles, and that each gamete
contains one and only one of these alleles. These alleles are a source of
genetic variability among offspring. Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment
says that the alleles for one trait separate independently of the alleles for
another trait. This also helps ensure genetic variability among offspring.
Mendel’s laws have their limitations. For example, if two genes are on the
same chromosome, the assortment of their alleles will not be independent.
Also, for genes found on the X chromosome, expression of the trait can be
linked to the sex of the offspring. Our knowledge of genetics and the tools we
use in its study have advanced a great deal since Mendel’s time, but his
basic concepts still stand true.
Drosophila melanogaster,
the common fruit fly, has been used for genetic experiments since T.H. Morgan
started his experiments in1907. Drosophila
make good genetic specimens because they are small, produce many offspring,
have easily discernable mutations, have only four pairs of chromosomes, and
complete their entire life cycle in about 12 days. They also have very simple
food requirements. Chromosomes 1 (the X chromosome), 2, and 3 are very
large, and the Y chromosome – number 4 – is extremely small. These four
chromosomes have thousands of genes, many of which can be found in most
eukaryotes, including humans.
Drosophila
embryos develop in the egg membrane. The egg hatches and produces a larva that
feeds by burrowing through the medium. The larval period consists of three
stages, or instars, the end of each stage marked by a molt. Near the end of
the larval period, the third instar will crawl up the side of the vial, attach
themselves to a dry surface, and form a pupae. After a while the adults
emerge.
Differences in body features help distinguish between
male and female flies. Females are slightly larger and have a light-colored,
pointed abdomen. The abdomen of males will be dark and blunt. The male flies
also have dark bristles, sex combs, on the upper portion of the forelegs.
Hypothesis:
After performing a dihybrid cross between males with
normal wings and sepia eyes and females with vestigial wings and red eyes, we
expect to see only hybrids with normal wings and red eyes in the first filial
generation. Then we expect to observe a 9:3:3:1 ratio of phenotypes in the
second filial generation.
Materials
and Methods:
A vial of wild-type Drosophila was thermally immobilized and the flies were placed in a
petri dish. Traits were observed. A vial of prepared Drosophila was immobilized and then observed under a dissecting
microscope. Males and females were separated and mutations were observed and
recorded. The parental generation was placed in the morgue. The vial was
placed in an incubator to allow the F1 generation to mature.
The F1 generation was immobilized and examined under a dissecting
microscope. The sex and mutations of each fly were recorded. Five mating pairs
of the F1 generation were placed into a fresh culture vial, and the
vial was placed in an incubator. The remaining F1 flies were placed
in the morgue. The F1 flies were left in the vial for about a week
to mate and lay eggs. Then the adults were removed and placed in the morgue.
The vial was placed back in the incubator to allow the F2
generation to mature. The F2 generation was immobilized and
examined under a dissecting microscope. The sex and mutations of each fly were
recorded.
Results:
Table 1 Phenotypes of the Parental Generation
|
Phenotypes |
Number of Males |
Number of Females |
|
Normal wings/red eyes |
0 |
0 |
|
Normal wings/sepia eyes |
3 | 0 |
|
vestigial wings/red eyes |
0 | 4 |
|
vestigial wings/sepia eyes |
0 | 0 |
Table 2 Phenotypes of the F1 Generation
| Phenotype | Number of Males | Number of Females |
|
Normal wings/red eyes |
78 | 95 |
|
Normal wings/sepia eyes |
0 | 0 |
|
vestigial wings/red eyes |
0 | 0 |
|
vestigial wings/sepia eyes |
0 | 0 |
Table 3 Phenotypes of the F2 Generation
| Phenotypes | Number of Males | Number of Females |
|
Normal wings/red eyes |
4 | 7 |
|
Normal wings/sepia eyes |
4 | 5 |
|
vestigial wings/red eyes |
0 | 1 |
|
vestigial wings/sepia eyes |
0 | 0 |
| normal red/mutated body shape | 2 | 0 |
| normal sepia/mutated body shape | 1 | 0 |
Questions
Discussion and Conclusion:
The results of our parental cross turned out just as
expected, but our F2 generation was not normal. Some sort of
mutation must have occurred that caused the strange body shape seen in several
individuals of our F2 generation.